Harry Palmer
Very Addicted
- Messages
- 1,321
- Points
- 860
Med, you've lost me now, I really don't know what the webcam murder has to do with passwords, I'll read the link again later on.
While i agree with most points my big problem is that the police do NOT need a search warrant to do so , they request passwords you say yes/no if you say no then yo can be charged, do we not "police by consent" in this country!, consent has been refused but still be charged. To do a search on your premises they need a warrant this would include your paper mail.
Also some computers and sites use biometric logins (fingerprint, eye retina) and they can "force" you to unlock devices
I would say that there are good and bad police, some are highly competent and fair minded while others are lazy and vindictive...sometimes even a good police officer can have a bad day....most of my family were police, either from cadet college or after being in the military, I've seen the police warts an all for most of my life.I'd not be a Police Officer...never. Under staffed, poor pay, every 'weekend lawyer' having a pop at them, Joe Public giving jip on social media and there is SFA they can do about it... they can't do right; tell the truth I feel sorry for them.
I would say that there are good and bad police, some are highly competent and fair minded while others are lazy and vindictive...sometimes even a good police officer can have a bad day....most of my family were police, either from cadet college or after being in the military, I've seen the police warts an all for most of my life.
Putting a lot of power in the hands of a lazy or vindictive bully is a recipe for disaster as they can twist the facts to fit a prejudiced theory as has been seen in the recent collapsed cases where the police were found to have withheld digital evidence that would have exonerated the defendant.
The system is far from perfect but its all we have.
I'd not be a Police Officer...never. Under staffed, poor pay, every 'weekend lawyer' having a pop at them, Joe Public giving jip on social media and there is SFA they can do about it... they can't do right; tell the truth I feel sorry for them.
The problem is that its always the lazy, incompetent or vindictive ones that make the news or stick in the memory...not the thousands of small services that take place each day to keep most of us safe and honest.
The problem is that its always the lazy, incompetent or vindictive ones that make the news or stick in the memory...not the thousands of small services that take place each day to keep most of us safe and honest.
Kind of how I feel, known a few coppers over the years and I take my hat off to them for their restraint.
Yes there are bad ones, same as anything and things like the cover up over the Brazilian guy getting shot are worrying but (not making excuses) we have cover ups in the NHS (dodgy blood from the 80's), organisations can do it if there's enough pressure.
Sorry but when either the individuals or the organisation start getting a bit selective about what happened then it's going to lead to accusations of a cover up. I have every sympathy with the officers involved, I've spoken out about ROE's in the past to people with a lot of gold on their shoulders and how guys were guilty until proven innocent. I'm just not comfortable with organisations like the police or NHS or government's being free and easy with stuff like this.I’d be interested to know in what way it was a cover up. Having been briefed on it thoroughly when looked at rules of engagement for suspected suicide bombers the issue was a mistake of misidentification of the unfortunate individual as a suspected suicide bomber on route to deploying his device. From that moment on the policy was always to use absolute lethal force as anything else further endangers life. The two policemen who fired the shots seemed to lack faith in the system to back them and said they shouted a warning when they didn’t (not were they required to) but they were under an enormous amount of stress and could have genuinely believed that a warning had been given.
Ian Blair should not have been claiming the glory so quickly but there was no cover up.
38
Not how I recall it at the time.Hills borough is a completely different matter.
The metropolitan police made no attempt to cover up de Menzies shooting; the officers who pulled the trigger said in court they shouted a warning when witnesses said they didn’t. They may have beloved that they had shouted the warning; they may have thought that they were supposed to shout a warning ( which in the circumstances they were not required to do) but they were acting st a degree of stress that few of us will ever experience, the court found that they had acted correctly on the information given to them.
Allocate blame to a mistake in intelligence (which happens) or to sit Ian Blair trying to big his force up to soon after a confusing and complex incident (which shouldn’t happen) but it wasn’t a cover up.
38
Society is terminally ill IMHO, going down the crapper, and faster now we Boris at the helm and Brexit will finish off the little remaining industry we have left in the UK, things can only get worse for the Police and society in general
This image is doing the rounds on forums, I think its apt and sadly true