Agreed Mike, I have a few sharp and/or pointy things around the house and sheds. I also have a load of wood at the side of the house, I also post on here about going off to the woods to spend a night. Not that you need an axe or kukri etc to kill a person, we've also got a range of things from battery powered drills to steak knives that can make you go 'ouch'. I think I can have one of those zombie knife things in Scotland although feck knows why I would.If a knife has a legitimate purpose other than as a weapon then it is legal to own it, however zombie knives are pretty useless other than for intimidation or wounding. The legitimacy of your purpose for owning a knife could be tested in court. The same knife in the possession of one person could be seen as legitimate while it could be illegal for another person in a different situation who would have no lawful reason.
Edit; For example, I own a machete and as a landowner who has to clear scrub I have an unarguably legitimate reason to own one...while a young man with a troubled history and no access to outside space would have difficulty justifying a machete should his home get searched for any reason...even though it really is a tool.
Not that I would buy anything like this , but if you were to have one in your own home IE not walking around outside with , can you still get nicked for just owing one?
View attachment 22968
Cheap China crap no doubt, Peoples morality does a swift runner when profits rears it ugly headWhat really peeves me it that there are a lot of kiddies toys that imitate this kind of crap......does not make any sense
Zombie Killer Knife Realistic Weapon - The Mad Hatter Novelty Joke & Fancy Dress Hire Shop, Yeovil, Somerset
Zombie Killer Knife Realistic Weaponwww.madhattersjokeshop.com
There were already specific laws in place. Assault, armed trespass, criminal damage, wounding, section 21 possession of firearm when disqualified etc. The newer acts had some good bits that tightened up some loopholes but for the most part the laws to punish violent crime already existed.While Laws are enacted to stop or prevent certain actions, it's rarely the case that the particular law is 100 % successful. What it does however is give the Police or other Authorities power to act when the (New) law is broken, which is generally the effect that Law makers are seeking, because they know that the law will still be ignored by some.
Drink driving hasn't been stopped, but if you are caught there is a law in place to deal with offenders.
Without a law being in place there would be no deterrent or course of action open to deal with offenders.
It may be that the Air gun licence requirement in Scotland doesn't reduce offences with air guns, but at least now there is a specific law being broken and action if necessary can be taken, and " Well there's no law against it mate" doesn't work when the Neds are on their way to pot Swans or similar and are caught with an unlicensed Air Gun..
I suspect Crossbows and Archery Bows will be on the list one day, it's just a matter of time. A Bloke in Wales was murdered with a high power Cross Bow within the last 2 years and there were a few squeaks from the Ban it Brigade here in Wales..
Sorry to disagree Mark but I don't buy into that logic at all. The kid getting shot in the eye was a tragedy, as is every person who gets killed by a drunk driver, I don't see anyone looking to either 'ban' cars or to call for more regular driving tests/refreshers etc and there's a lot more people killed by cars than air guns.To be honest about the whole thing (not aimed at any particular post or person ) if setting up a section of law for air rifles to be licensed allows the family of that poor wee boy to win a fight and rest in some kind of peace, then who cares about the logistics of the law surrounding air rifles..... it won’t stop idiots from braking the law, however as I’ve said, if the family of that wee lad has some justified peace in there life then so be it and it’s worth doing
I think that’s exactly the point, it won’t stop idiots acting like the idiots they are.I remember the incidents with horses being shot dozens of times with air guns makes my skin crawl thinking about it.To be honest about the whole thing (not aimed at any particular post or person ) if setting up a section of law for air rifles to be licensed allows the family of that poor wee boy to win a fight and rest in some kind of peace, then who cares about the logistics of the law surrounding air rifles..... it won’t stop idiots from braking the law, however as I’ve said, if the family of that wee lad has some justified peace in there life then so be it and it’s worth doing
Sorry to disagree Mark but I don't buy into that logic at all. The kid getting shot in the eye was a tragedy, as is every person who gets killed by a drunk driver, I don't see anyone looking to either 'ban' cars or to call for more regular driving tests/refreshers etc and there's a lot more people killed by cars than air guns.