Here you come in a lightweight thread with the next unnecessary heavy piece of equipment.
Do you want to confuse beginners?
Why don't you open an own thread, where you explain your equipment as a for you surely well working complete system?
And another, where you explain British military equipment as a complete system, what would be surely very interesting to a lot of people?
Please don't forget to tell us about the weight of the stuff. So people easier can compare it!
Not everybody uses a Landrover or canoe when he goes outdoors, and not everybody wants to sit the whole weekend in one place, because his camping stuff is to heavy to carry it over longer distances.
That thread here stands in the "on foot" section. We discuss here lightweight hiking equipment!
I surely do not need to work in a military office or to serve in an army to compare different military equipments with high end products of the civil market and to decide what is helpfull for civil use.
Often soldiers become blind for theyr equipment while serving in an army for longer times.
I met enough of Bundeswehr soldiers who thought, that the (soldiers personal) green equipment from the seventies or early eighties would have been better than the Wehrmacht equipment, which had been ten times better, and I met as well others who thought, cheap civil products would have been better than the outstanding good Flecktarn equipment, which was in the nineties nearly the best one could buy at the world market. But they simply didn't understand the given stuff.
I used civil and military equipment from all sides of WW2 and cold war as well as Swiss and Swedish stuff and low budget, middle priced and high end civil equipment.
And I was teached how to use it by former officers who had been out with Manstein and Rommel as well as using the stuff for civil expeditions and alpine mountain hiking on all continents. And I used the stuff myself for more than 40 years everywhere in western Europe in all conditions.
I agree, that cooking a meal over amber is far better than over fire. But to hang the pot over amber is better than everything else, especially if it is a
For water sterilisation or to make a tea or coffee it is much faster to hang the pot over a hand full of compressed and in its structure broken very thin pine twigs. That's nearly as fast as boiling water with a gas stove.
May be that in very hot or cold conditions a plastic bottle is better than an aluminium or steel bottle.
In normal conditions a titanium or steel bottle can be easily disinfected by boiling water in it and is the better, but in this case not the really lighter thing.
The stainless steel bottle I recommended has the same weight like the British army plastic bottle.
But the british army cup is far heavier than necessary. The titanium mugs are really tough enough, surely for civil use, probably for military use, because they are tougher than aluminium cups other armies had in use, which mainly came out of use, because you burn with them your lips if you want to dring something hot out of them.
When the british army mug was created, and I think it was in the eighties, titanium mugs hadn't yet been on the market. The first I have seen in the nineties and they costed ten times more than the stainless steel mugs.
Titanium was used in the eighties by Campagnolo who was involved in the Ariane Space program and sold titanium screws and other parts replacing steel to professional racing bike teams for use at the Tour de France and Giro d'Italia.
But all that had been solid parts like screws, no thin sheets or plates, I guess, the technique to produce mugs simply wasn't developed in this time.